Book vs. Movie
Howl's Moving Castle

Written by Diana Wynne Jones and published in 1986

Directed by Hayao Miyazaki and released in 2004 
Hayao Miyazaki’s production of Howl’s Moving Castle is the movie that I most frequently list as my favorite movie of all time.  So, I admit that I was terribly nervous to read this book.  There’s a reason our six star rating is subtitled “Inconceivable!” – how often does a movie production actually surpass the book?  No, more often than not, the book will blow any film attempt out of the water.  And I admit that I really didn’t want this movie to be ruined for me, even by a book that I would probably love. 

Well, guess what?  That’s exactly what happened.  And I can’t even be sorry about it because Howl’s Moving Castle by Diana Wynne Jones is now one of my favorite books of all time.  Sorry movie; I still adore you and all but you’re just not the same.  While the movie does a great job with some aspects of the book and does, in my opinion, capture the overall flavor of the story, it really misses the mark in some key areas.  
Picture
As the book opens, we are introduced to Sophie and her family.  Sophie is the eldest of three, which in this universe means that she will be doomed to poor prospects.  All of her parents’ (her father and not-so-wicked stepmother's) hopes are placed on the shoulders of the youngest sister, Martha.  The middle sister, Lettie, is a strong-willed girl who likes to get her own way.  

When Sophie’s father dies unexpectedly, her stepmother realizes that she will not be able to support them all.  Sophie’s sisters are sent out to apprentice at a bakery (Lettie) and with a witch (Martha).  Sophie is left to apprentice in the hat shop.  Resigned to her fate, she works day and night designing and building hats, becoming more and more isolated and fretful.  It gets so bad that she’s afraid to even visit her sister down the street.  She also develops a rather kooky habit of speaking to the hats she’s building.

The movie condenses Sophie’s sisters down to one – Lettie – who works in a bakery.  Sophie’s mother runs the hat shop and Sophie’s father is simply not present.  While I think the movie excellently portrays Sophie’s isolation and dreariness, it fails to capture the extent of her fear and she’s never, not once, shown speaking to a hat.  Which is a damn shame.

Picture
In the book, Sophie finally gets up the courage to visit her sister, but ends up heading out on May Day, amidst a riot of celebration and flirting.  Halfway there, she runs into a striking looking man with a silver and blue suit, white-blond hair, and eyes like green marbles.  She’s jumpy and he teases her a bit for being afraid, calling her a mouse and saying that the only wished to take her out for a drink.  Ultimately, he wishes her well and leaves her be.  The movie follows this same basic path, except that instead, Sophie is set upon in an alley by two smarmy officers who are very much into rape-flirting.  Howl (the striking looking man, of course!) comes along to rescue her from them.  Then they escape some giant black blob-men by flying through the sky.  Which is a tad…different.

When Sophie reaches the bakery, she finds out that her sisters Martha and Lettie have used a magic spell (learned from Martha’s apprenticeship) to switch places.  Martha is now quite a hit at the bakery, where she has already received dozens of proposals and Lettie is finally being challenged as a magician’s apprentice.  Martha tells Sophie plainly that she believes her stepmother is taking advantage of her.  Sophie seems to have some sort of talent for fashion, and her stepmother is constantly away “gadding” while Sophie is left in the shop.  She doesn’t even earn a wage.  Stunned by this revelation, Sophie leaves, intending to confront her stepmother.

All of this is really played down in the film.  “Lettie” – Sophie’s one sister simply says “do something for yourself once in a while, okay?” as she’s leaving.  The mom is never mentioned.

Back at the shop, Sophie feels more and more discontent.  She snarks hilariously at customers and grumbles when her stepmother promises her a wage but then forgets all about it.  Just when she’s about had enough, a “carefully beautiful,” glamorous patron enters and demands to see her hats.  This elegant lady is, of course, The Witch of The Waste.  (Dun dun dun!!!)

In the movie TWoTW does look rather…imposing…I guess, but it must be said that she also looks like a complete freak show.  Observe:

Picture
Neck rolls.
In either case, the result is the same.  Sophie gets cursed by TWoTW and suddenly she’s been aged by about seventy years.  She’s ancient.  But, instead of getting upset about it, Sophie decides to locate her heretofore hidden giant cojones and set out into the world immediately to seek her fortune and give that witch what’s coming to her.  The movie basically captures this, but Sophie is shown fretting about her decision to leave quite a bit more and putting it off until the morning.  Sophie’s journey toward her destiny is also a bit different, which brings me to the first MAJOR CHANGE.

MAJOR CHANGE #1: Sophie's Character

Sophie of the Book
  • Ginger hair
  • Angry/Blunt/Stubborn
  • Frequently tells all and sundry just where they can go
  • Cleans as a way of escaping her present circumstances
  • Self-delusional
  • Strong magical ability
Sophie of the Movie
  • Brown hair
  • Kind, if a bit gruff
  • Frequently invites all and sundry to live in Howl's castle without his permission
  • Neat-freak
  • Knows her feelings very well
  • No magical ability whatsoever
Sophie as a character has a completely different feel between the book and the movie.  Sophie of the book is a complete badass who tells it like it is but also has a tendency to avoid her problems by indulging in a little angry-cleaning.  She’s stubborn to a fault, nosy, and she tends to hide her vulnerability behind a wall of irritation.  In the movie, she feels more emotional, more considerate, and more child-like almost.  In the book she also (it is later revealed) has a very strong magical ability.  When she speaks to everyday objects, like her hats, she influences them magically with her words.  

In the book, Sophie pulls a scarecrow out of a hedge and helps free a trapped dog on her way to seek her fortune.  She accidentally speaks the scarecrow to life and it follows her.  Sophie is completely repulsed/scared of the scarecrow and repeatedly does everything she can to get away from it in the book.  In the movie, the scarecrow is already alive.  It brings her a walking stick and leads her to Howl’s castle.  She gives it a nickname (“turnip-head”) and seems quite content in its presence.

Once Sophie finds the castle, she has to run after it, force her way in, and then engage in a little trickery to convince Howl’s fifteen year old apprentice, Michael, to let her stay the night.  In the movie, the castle stops, lets her in right away, and Michael is nowhere to be seen.  The next day he appears, although in the movie he’s a nine year old boy named Markl (seriously...).  In both cases, Sophie speaks with Calcifer, Howl’s fire demon and agrees to a deal: she’ll help him break his contract with Howl if he helps remove her curse.  Sophie pretends to be Howl’s new housekeeper and cleans the heck out of that pigsty, including Howl's much-used bathroom, which leads to the most hilarious scene in both the book and the movie.
Picture
I don't see the point in living...
Oh yes, I think that lovers of this story in either of its forms will know exactly what I am talking about: THE TANTRUM.  In both the book and the movie, Sophie mixes up Howl's beautification potions somehow and he ends up dyeing his hair a different color than usual.  Emotional breakdown ensues.  They actually do a very good job of showing this in the movie, complete with howling ghouls, screaming, and green slime.  However, in the book it's even funnier because Howl's hair doesn't get turned black (as in the film) - it merely has a few added reddish/gold strands.  And yet, green slime.  Sophie of the book is a lot less emotional about it.  She doesn't cry; she merely leaves until he settles down and then stomps back in to shunt him into the bathtub and call him a big baby.  In the book she sheds a few tears for her hurt feelings and then essentially does the same thing. 

Which brings me to MAJOR CHANGE #2: Howl Loves War, Not Girls
First, let's just get this whole "war" business out of the way: never happened.  That's right, in the book there is no crazy war going on, fought by winged blob men and questionably aerodynamic buzzing ships.  That whole part was manufactured just for the movie.  And let's be honest, it doesn't even really fit in the movie.  

So, in the book, Howl is constantly busy either primping himself or taking up his guitar to go woo various girls across the country.  His main goal in life is to avoid all decision-making and responsibility of any kind.  Whenever one of his ladies starts to return his "love" he immediately tucks tail and runs.  In the movie, he's constantly busy as well...with the war.  Some girls gossip at the beginning that he likes to "eat young girls' hearts" and he mentions later that he once pursued TWoTW, but he's definitely not the flirty drama queen that I know and love from the book.  Again, this is a damn shame.

Picture
One thing that I thought they did very well in the movie was the visual of Howl's front door.  In the book it has a dial which can be turned so that the door opens up on different areas of the kingdom and they show this very well in the movie.  However, there is one MAJOR CHANGE here.

MAJOR CHANGE #3: Howl's Hideaway
In the movie, the black section of the dial opens up into what looks like a giant space filled with smoke, fire, and blackness into which Howl flies (ostensibly to go fight that damn war some more).  In the book, it opens up to an inch of indescribable black-ish thickness, which then leads to...WALES.  Yes, Wales.  As in, modern day (1980's) has computers and cars and suburbs...Wales.  It turns out that our man Howl is actually Howell, a modern day Welshman who somehow found the door between worlds and left his old life to study magic in Sophie's realm.  Pretty neat, huh?  This is all totally cut from the movie.

Another thing that I love about the movie is how the animators visually represent both Howl's descent into evil and Sophie's gradual breaking of her curse.  In the movie, Howl is shown changing into a giant black bird over and over again when he fights, and is eventually unable to turn back.  While this doesn't happen in the book at all, I thought it was a really interesting way to show him losing the fight against his curse (more on the curse later).  Likewise, the animated Sophie is shown throughout the film changing subtly from old to young and back again depending on her mood.  This also does not happen in the book, but it's an ingenious way to show that she's fighting against her curse.

And now, for MAJOR CHANGE #4: The Curse.  
In the book, Howl once caught a falling star, gave it his heart, and joined in a contract with it for more powerful magic.  That star was Calcifer.  This is essentially the same in the movie, except that the bigger picture surrounding this story has been completely changed.  Howl of the book was actually cursed to complete this task (along with a long list of other things inspired by a John Donne poem) by TWoTW.  See, in the book, she is what's known as the BIG BAD.  She and her fire demon have been gunning for Howl ever since he dumped her way back when.  In the movie, TWoTW does attempt to curse Howl but he easily deflects it.  She later loses all of her magic to the movie's big bad (with an assist from some giant light bulbs and harmonizing shadows) and is reduced, by the end of the film, to a rather pillowy-looking grandmother figure.

Picture
MAJOR CHANGE #5: The Big Bad Now Loves Mob Caps
With TWoTW stripped of her big bad status, the movie replaces her with this gal to the left.  She's the King's wizard, named Suliman.  In the book, there is a character called Ben Suliman who is the King's wizard, but he's:
a) a man
b) not evil and
c) missing
He's also, coincidentally, also from Wales and is really named Ben Sullivan. Suliman from the movie seems in part a fabrication and in part stolen from another character in the book: Mrs. Pentstemmon, Howl's old tutor (who is also not evil in any way, and is actually murdered by TWoTW in the book). And now that the MAJOR CHANGES are coming fast and furious, I'll just move on to 

MAJOR CHANGE #6: This is the One Where I Throw Together All the Random Things That Happen in the End.
So, it turns out that TWoTW's eeeeevil plan was to kidnap both Wizard Suliman, the King's son Justin, and Howl and stitch together all of her favorite parts from each of them to create her perfect mate.  Naturally, she has been waiting for Howl's pretty face to be the head.  The spare/leftover parts she combined into the scarecrow, a skull, and a man who can change into a dog (this is the kind of logic that only makes sense to a true BIG BAD).  Howl does battle with TWoTW and her fire demon while Sophie figures out the curse and eventually transfers Howl's heart back into his body.  Sophie's family reappears, the various body parts get magically put back together the right way, and Calcifer breaks Sophie's curse.  And then Howl and Sophie decide to live happily ever after.  Awwww.

In the movie, Sophie breaks Howl's contract with Calcifer by reinserting his heart, the "big bad" suddenly decides to stop with the warring (pffft, some big bad), and this scene happens:

Picture
which, honestly...I never thought I'd stop loving.  I mean, what could ever, ever beat this?

Wow, Sophie your hair looks just like starlight.  It’s beautiful!”
Do you think so?  So do I!”


Unfortunately, this is yet another scene that Diana Wynne Jones' wonderful, horrible book stole from me.  Observe:

“‘Would you call your hair ginger?’

‘Red Gold,’ Sophie said.  Not much had changed about Howl that she could see, now he had his heart back, except maybe that his eyes seemed a deeper color – more like eyes and less like glass marbles.  ‘Unlike some people’s,’ she said, ‘it’s natural.’

‘I’ve never seen why people put such value on things being natural,’ Howl said, and Sophie knew then that he was scarcely changed at all.”


Sigh...now that's what I call romance.

I know that this is still a pretty positive rating for the movie, but it still pains me a bit to give this adaptation:

"You're in for a treat.  We all are." 
(From The Witches, by Roald Dahl and directed by Nicolas Roeg in 1990)
There were some minor changes that we didn't like, but for the most part this was a decent adaptation. 
 


Comments

07/15/2012 14:13

I loved the movie so much when I first saw it. Now I really have to read the book.

Great post.

Reply
07/15/2012 16:49

I hope you do read it! It's a great book and I think if you liked the movie, you'll enjoy the book too.

Reply
07/15/2012 16:07

Miyazaki just doesn't seem able to resist inserting a war into his movies. He has to simplify the main story considerably in order to have time for his airship battles and that does weaken it considerably (particularly, for instance, the shapechanged prince, who has no satisfying conclusion to his story in the movie).

I think it's implied that movie Sophie does have magic, but she's less actively shown using it.

I do like the movie - it's so beautiful and romantic. I just treat it as a different story.

The sequels do feature Howl and Sophie, but they're participants in other peoples' stories rather than it being their story.

Reply
07/15/2012 16:58

Yes - the scarecrow changing into the lost prince at the end of the movie is something that I completely forgot to mention. Sometimes these posts get so long...I lose track of the details.

Gosh, I've seen the movie literally a hundred times or more and I've never gotten the impression that Sophie had magic. Do you mean the parts where she changes in age, maybe? Or when the ring leads her back in time?

I can't wait to read the sequels, and more from Diana Wynne Jones in general. Thanks for stopping by Andrea!

Reply
Andrea
07/16/2012 13:37

No, both in the hat making (she doesn't talk to them, but the success of the shop suggests that they're casting glamours on people) and in the way "the magic world" behaves towards her. The castle, for instance, slows to let her in (without any instruction from Calcifer).

07/16/2012 13:39

Interesting! That never crossed my mind before but I like it!

07/15/2012 17:33

I'm going to come back to this post once I've read the book and seen the movie! (Yep, I still haven't, terrible isn't it!)

Reply
07/16/2012 04:22

I have never seen this movie OR read this book. I will have to change that soon Honestly, I really can't think of many examples where I feel the movie adaptation has been better or at least equally as good as the book version. Still, I'm looking forward to giving this a shot. :)

Reply
07/18/2012 03:38

Well, I never seen the movie (but Spirited Away is one of my favourites) or read the book and now I have to decide which one to do first.
But I think I would take Wales over war any day :)

Reply
Nina
07/19/2012 17:24

This is a great review of the book and the movie! I've read the book and watched the movie and love both for different reasons. The book is such a wonderful adventure about Sophie that is very well written as well as fun and exciting to read. The movie which is just as fun, seems so different from the book. The characters are there but the story and feel of the book is just not the same. Although the story is different, Miyazaki's animation is so amazing that it makes up for all the major changes in story. I recommend both versions, each for it's mental and visual aspects.

Reply
07/19/2012 20:01

Ah yes, I'm just finally settling down to read this one (even though I already know how you feel), so happy to read your detailed thoughts! I too was disappointed that a lot of the quirk and charm seemed to have been left out of the movie, like talking to hats and suits and what not. I didn't think movie Sophie was near sassy enough. :P

I think I was even more disappointed about the changes in Howl, the fact that he isn't the 'flirty drama queen' was a let down. I also loved the connection to Wales in the book with Howl and Sulliman. Plus, I wasn't compelled to watch the ending of the movie repeatedly as I was compelled to read the ending of Howl.

Still, they're both great...just...the book is SO MUCH BETTER. I'll stick to Spirited Away. =)

Reply
Justine
08/09/2012 20:47

Hi! So I read the book and I never saw the movie but was disappointed to hear that it was anime. So I saw the trailer and was like what the heck?!?! Howls is not a bird!! And I pictured the castle as being black and not very big and NOT having legs!

Reply
Grace
12/29/2012 12:00

Oh gosh, I thought I was the only one who liked the book more than the movie. I watched the movie first, but I feel so much of their personalities just get lost in making room for the 'war.' And honestly,when I watch the movie, I still don't get what the war is even about.

I love the seen in the book with the weed killer as well because it was just so darn Sophie, and I missed that in the movie is well.

I've read the other two books as well, so you should enjoy them!

Reply
Jordon
03/22/2013 17:32

I feel the same as the author. I loved the movie so much I went and ordered it and was just almost angry at how different they are (which was just absurd right!) I was looking at the book like it had three eyes with the whole connection to Wales.. but I got over it and really enjoyed the book.. certainly makes you realize how much creative license they took with the movie adaption.

Reply



Leave a Reply