The Readventurer
  • Home
  • YA Reviews
  • Adult Reviews
  • Contests and Giveaways
  • Policies
  • About Us
    • Flannery's Challenges
    • Catie's Challenges
  • Contact Us

Odds & Ends On the Web: September 1st Edition

9/1/2012

9 Comments

 
Readventurer Odds & Ends Logo
Understandably, the most widely discussed article this week was The New York Times' The Best Book Reviews Money Can Buy. It's not that we are surprised that for-sale reviews exist and are easily available, for a fee, of course (didn't we just witness a huge scandal involving Chick Lit Girls who will give your book an "honest" review for $95 with the stipulation that ALL of their reviews are positive, you know, because they are just nice gals like that?). It's the sheer scope of Mr. Rutherford's activities and the amount of cash available to be made in this line of work.

The things that especially stand out in this article are: that it is estimated that about 30% of all reviews online are fake and that one of the first successful self-published authors - John Locke - essentially owes his success to the positive reviews purchased from Mr. Rutherford's company. This is why self-publishing keeps fascinating us. All this success, and it is often due to such unsavory promotional activities - fake reviews, cashing in on reusing stolen characters and recycled fanfiction, extensive outrageous online behavior. Of course, not every self-publishing success in marred in controversy, but it is obvious why posts like Salon's Can self-publishing buy respect? exist. It's hard to disagree with this point by Salon - "employing a service that dishonest and cynical demonstrates a bizarre contempt for the reader." Add to it constant battles between authors (self-published and traditional too) and reviewers, on Amazon and especially Goodreads, and the picture is very dire.

What is the most ironic about the whole story though is the tale of Mr. Rutherford's demise, brought by, you guessed it, a disgruntled self-published author. Gives you a flashback to the recent incident when self-published authors took down a completely legitimate ebook lending site, after misunderstanding its purpose and their own contracts with Amazon. Truly, self-publishing is a world full of wonders.

So, what are we readers to do when evidently so many of the reviews online are fake and misleading? Regardless of all the bad press Goodreads has been getting, the way we see it, it is still the best way to get honest book recommendations. Your online friends found on this site are far less likely to let you down and fool you with fraudulent reviews.

Or, alternatively, you can try using this handy chart to decipher Amazon review graphs. 

A couple of agents posted some things recently that are not exactly new, but still sort of sad. There are indeed "dead genres," genres which no agent wants to touch any more. Sarah LaPolla and Suzie Townsend are petty certain dystopias as a genre are no longer sellable. Which is not in itself is so tragic, because we all are definitely sick of the same stories, but it's how this genre craze unfolds is what is disheartening. A runaway bestseller is born, and every agent, editor and publisher is in a rush to replicate the success by buying everything similar, despite its often poor quality. Once the craze is over, you can have an outstanding novel, but nobody will be interested in it any more, the market is simply over-saturated with garbage.

Which brings the whole topic back to self-publishing, of course. Phoebe North brought to our attention an article a few days ago titled The New Vanity Publishing: Traditional Publishing, which basically states that there are legitimate situations when seeking traditional publishers is just not worth it. Publishing is a business after all, and there always will be works unsuitable for the traditional road, be that because the subject matter is too niche, the book belongs to a "dead genre," or any number of reasons. In the end, as we said before, every author has his/her own route to take, and there are bumps and rewards on whichever road they choose.

Ugh, time to wrap up this rambly post, too heavy on self-pub vs. traditional arguments. For something more cheery check out this post on BuzzFeed, where reviewers exercise their creativity making fun of a new, slightly sexist, product - Bic pen, a special edition for women, because as we all know, only having a pink pen can make us, girls, want to write something.

9 Comments
VeganYANerds link
9/1/2012 09:36:55 am

It is such a shame that some genres are now so worn out because we got too many of the same books all at once, especially when I bet there are some good books that will miss out on being published

Reply
Tatiana (The Readventurer) link
9/2/2012 06:41:16 am

I wish there were more choosing of good books rather than chasing various band wagons...

Reply
Andrea link
9/1/2012 06:35:49 pm

It's my fond wish that all the rhetoric will scale down in a few years, and self-pub will be just another option that a writer might or might not take, depending on their circumstances.

[Though I'm also hoping we'll see a balancing influence on trade publishing contracts - the ones Kristine Rusch discusses are mind-boggling.]

Reply
Tatiana (The Readventurer) link
9/2/2012 06:43:53 am

I think the situation will stabilize. With quite of self-published works making it big, it's clear this way of publishing isn't going anywhere.

Need to read more about the issues with publishing contracts more. It's another fascinating topic that is completely new to me.

Reply
Adina link
9/1/2012 10:07:25 pm

Great post. I understand why authors go the self publishing route, especially if their book is in a dead genre. It must be incredibly frustrating to have a book rejected simply because the genre is yesterdays news. I can't understand why publishers flood the market with a particular genre. Surely a reader is less likely to become bored with a genre if they have some variety in their reading choice. Book stores can only carry so much stock and of course the books heavily marketed will be give prominence.

Reply
Tatiana (The Readventurer) link
9/2/2012 06:46:58 am

It saddens me that this sort of trend-hopping ruins genres for us, readers, because so much crap is being published that by the time you've waded through itm you don't have any love left for what you originally was drawn to.

Reply
Rachel link
9/2/2012 07:13:12 am

I never knew about the whole "chick lit" scandal. I just heard about the Amazon story a couple of days ago and both are very disappointing. Gives blogging and reviewing a bad name. :( Looks like the Chick Lit Girls aren't even online anymore. Probably started a new blog with a different name.

Reply
Maja
9/3/2012 03:20:58 am

A while back, one of my favorite self-published authors, Zach Rawlins, wrote a guest post for the Library about his experience with self-publishing, and made several valid points in favor of it.But no matter how many self-published works I discover and end up enjoying, I still can't get rid of my prejudices. To each his/her own, I guess. I have a few indie and self-published authors I keep an eye on, of that, maybe two or three I review regularly, the rest just flies right by me. I've even stopped responding to all those review requests I receive.

Anyway, I want a pink pen. That is all.

Reply
Jennifer
9/21/2012 05:11:37 pm

Great to know this.I haven't gone through this book yet.I'll love to read it in future.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Follow Us On:

    Facebook Twitter Feed

    Subscribe:

    Subscribe
    Follow on Bloglovin

    Subscribe via email:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


    What We're Reading:

    Blood of my Blood cover

    Flannery

    Goodreads
    Monstrous Affections cover

     Tatiana

    Goodreads
    Rules of Civility cover

      Catie

    Goodreads

    Archives 

    March 2014
    September 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011

    Categories

    All
    Author Spotlight
    Book Events
    Book Vs. Movie
    Catie's Adult Reviews
    Catie's Y.A. Reviews
    Contest Or Giveaway
    Flannery's Adult Reviews
    Flannery's Y.A. Reviews
    If You Like This Maybe That
    Library Quest
    Odds & Ends On The Web
    Randomness
    Readalong Recaps
    She Made Me Do It
    Tatiana's Adult Reviews
    Tatiana's Y.A. Reviews
    Three Heads Are Better Than One Or Two
    Year Of The Classics


    Blogs We Follow

    Angieville
    Anna Scott Jots
    Badass Book Reviews
    The Book Geek
    The Book Smugglers
    Book Harbinger
    Books Take You Places
    Bunbury in the Stacks
    Chachic's Book Nook
    Clear Eyes, Full Shelves
    Collections
    Cuddlebuggery
    For the Love of Words
    The Galavanting Girl Books
    Inkcrush
    Intergalactic Academy
    Ivy Book Bindings
    The Nocturnal Library
    Rainy Day Ramblings
    The Readers Den
    The Reading Date
    Realm of Fiction
    Sash and Em
    Stacked
    The Unread Reader
    Vegan YA Nerds
    Wear The Old Coat
    Wordchasing
    Wrapped Up In Books
    Young Adult Anonymous 

    Grab A Button

    The Readventurer
    <div align="center"><a href="http://www.thereadventurer.com" title="The Readventurer"><img src="http://www.weebly.com/uploads/7/8/9/9/7899923/custom_themes/149267861480723643/files/TheReadventurer.png?1321429794244" alt="The Readventurer" style="border:none;" /></a></div>

    Parajunkee Design
    SiteLock
    Since 2/4/2012

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License.
Photos used under Creative Commons from savillent, vue3d, vue3d, ljcybergal