The Readventurer
  • Home
  • YA Reviews
  • Adult Reviews
  • Contests and Giveaways
  • Policies
  • About Us
    • Flannery's Challenges
    • Catie's Challenges
  • Contact Us

Book vs. Movie: Courtney Summers On The Woman In Black + Giveaway

6/21/2012

37 Comments

 
The Woman in Black movie poster

Book vs.Movie
The Woman in Black

Written by Susan Hill and published in 1983

Directed by James Watkins and released in 2012

Written by special guest author Courtney Summers
The Woman in Black cover

It's been a while since I read The Woman in Black by Susan Hill, but when I read it, I really liked it.  Set in the early 1900s, the novel is narrated by Arthur Kipps as he reflects on the time he was an engaged, up-and-coming solicitor who got more than he bargained for when he was sent to sort out the estate of a dead widow, Alice Drablow.  Young Arthur has a pretty good head on his shoulders until he gets to Crythin Gifford, where the book follows his complete and utter psychological breakdown as he discovers Alice Drablow's place, Eel Marsh House, is haunted.  You will never guess by whom!

SPOILER ALERT.

What you should know:  The Woman in Black is Alice Drablow's sister, Jennet.  When Jennet has a child, Nathaniel, out of wedlock--a bad thing back then--Alice adopts him.  In exchange for living with the Drablows to be close to her son, Jennet agrees never to reveal to Nathaniel she's his mother.  Sadly, Nathaniel drowns in the marsh surrounding the causeway to the house and his body is never recovered.  Jennet later dies and becomes The Woman in Black, a nasty ghoul, to say the least.  Whenever someone sees her, a child dies shortly after.  Once he learns all this the hard way, Arthur leaves Crythin Gifford, traumatized by his numerous experiences with the woman but assured no children have (yet) died because of them.  There's a false sense of security for us, the reader, in this.  We believe that because The Woman in Black's story has been told, she can finally rest.  But a few years later, when Arthur is settled into his first marriage and has a child of his own, he sees The Woman in Black and moments later, his family is in a tragic accident. Both his son and wife die.  The end!

END OF SPOILER.

The Woman in Black is a cozy and atmospheric novel.  Its charm lies in Hill's writing style, which is both familiar and suspenseful.  It carries a wonderful sense of foreboding that makes me feel THIS is what people want when they're looking for a classic ghost story, yet the ending is so startling--in a fantastic and devastating way--that it delivers more than you might be expecting by the time you reach it.  I give it all of my thumbs up!  You need to read this book, even if I just ruined it for you.

Now let's talk about the 2012 movie.

The film adaptation deviates from the source material right away and never really stops.  After a genre-requisite shocker of an opening, if you're easily shocked, we're introduced to Arthur Kipps, a widowed single father (!), so devastated by his wife's death from child birth he's mentally and emotionally checked out.  Arthur isn't interested in working his way up in the firm, he's going to Crythin Gifford in a last ditch attempt to save his job so he can continue to support his son. This is what keeps him there, even as the locals urge him to leave and children start to die.  Right off the bat, I wasn't sure what to make of Daniel Radcliffe as Arthur Kipps.  It's hard to say what he does or doesn't bring to his portrayal when he's not really portraying Kipps as readers know him.  I will say Radcliffe's performance is understated but not entirely convincing.  I believe he's a young man with some heavy burdens but I had a much, much harder time buying him as a husband and father.  He also looks freakishly like a young Richard Armitage throughout, which was distracting.  Please tell me I'm not the only one who sees this!
Daniel Radcliffe and Richard Armitage Woman In Black
Unfortunately, Arthur comes across as more duty-bound to his son than emotionally driven by his love for him so that even as the personal stakes are raised, his character growth is ultimately weak.  I wish that, if they insisted on keeping Kipps a widower, they made him a widower who appeared more together than he was, clinging onto and fiercely protective of the only good things left after his wife's death.

Most of the other characters are stock but I was okay with that.  In movies like this, you sometimes expect a character to be defined by their function rather than their depth, like the suspicious, terrified locals who urge Arthur to go away before their children start dying and the local children who look like creepy little dolls before they become creepy little ghosts.  The strongest character besides Arthur and the woman herself, is Sam Daily (played by Ciarán Hinds), the wealthiest man in town.  As in the book, Sam is hospitable and welcoming of Arthur but unlike the book, Sam's underlying motivations for reaching out and supporting him are slightly shadier, though not ill-intended.  The character of Sam Daily's wife was also expanded and paranormalized (this is now a word!) for the purposes of the film and I found I liked what that brought to it, overall.

The Woman in Black is nicely realized visually.  I think it captured the dense, eerie atmosphere of the book and that's what I was looking for, mainly, when I watched it.  Crythin Gifford is presented as both a grieving and cursed place and Eel Marsh House was spooky inside and out.  It was hard not to dread every time Arthur returned to it, knowing each time he did his encounters with the woman would escalate. 
Eel Marsh
The personal history of The Woman in Black doesn't deviate from the novel so much as extends it and makes it more active.  In the book, Arthur's sightings of the woman leave us holding our breath and awaiting the consequences.  In the movie, Arthur can scarcely look at her without a child dropping dead in a horrific manner a few seconds later--like, they commit suicide (one even sets herself on fire).  This brings an urgency to the story that I think would've been necessary no matter what direction the adaptation took and I appreciated that.  I also appreciated the various ways The Woman in Black asserted her presence in the background, unbeknownst to Arthur.  Those moments are the other reason I watched the movie and I found a lot of them scarier than they weren't.  Sometimes it felt like Where's Waldo?  Except you don't actually want to find Waldo! 
Picture
Picture
Gah!

So that was pretty great.

But now, let us examine the movie's next major deviation from the book--its ending--which brings us to my second...

SPOILER ALERT.

In the book, The Woman in Black is evil.  That's it.  Even after her truth is uncovered and shared by Arthur, she repays him by killing his entire family.  She's totally the UK equivalent of Kayako from Ju-On: The Grudge.  It doesn't matter if you sympathize with her enough to want to help her--SHE HATES YOU.  That is all you need to know. 
Juon Woman In Black
Gah!

The Woman in Black's angry unrest carries the movie up until the point Arthur reunites her with her dead son.  Then, it seems to get a tad confused.  Afterward, Arthur, who is a lot perkier than I would be if I went through what he went through, goes to the train station to meet his child and his child's nanny so they can go back to London as a happy family.  But Arthur's little boy sees The Woman in Black and decides to walk in front of an oncoming train instead. Arthur tries to save him and they're both killed as a result.  In the seconds that follow, Sam Daily sees the angry apparition of the woman and all the children she's taken on the other side of the platform.  It's actually pretty chilling and it would've been nice to know that while Arthur's arc differed from that of the book, it still came to the same kind of horrible end...

If not for the closing scene of Arthur in the afterlife, with his child, being reunited with his dead wife.  Who is dressed all in white.  Yeah.

What the heck is that!  Was it Arthur's love of his wife that kept him and his son out of a grim afterlife with The Woman in Black?  Or was it The Woman in White's love for Arthur?  Or was The Woman in Black's final act of malevolence actually a final act of mercy?  Did she know Arthur and his son would be reunited with his wife and decide, since Arthur reunited her with her son, she'd return the favor?  I have no idea, honestly, but I do know that all of these possibilities effectively take the edge off the best part of this story.  It's so much scarier and more effective to think of The Woman in Black as never satisfied and always angry, to think of ourselves as doomed from the moment we cross her path, simply because we crossed her path.  Love won't save you!  If it could, you'd think all those children would have lived!  But they didn't.

END OF SPOILER.

So that was a questionable and, in my opinion, unfortunate choice that undermined the story's foundation.  The book wasn't afraid to go there, so why was the movie?

Even so...

Sometimes--not always, but sometimes--there's something extremely satisfying about a horror movie that plays to the tropes or even the cliches of the genre because despite the predictability of those kinds of scares, there's a timelessness about them that can make them quite unnerving.  Like the ghost or serial killer POV--that moment we watch the unsuspecting hero or heroine through the very eyes of the thing that's haunting or stalking them--and let's not forget The Classic Mirror Scare, among others.  I encounter this stuff a lot as an avid horror movie watcher, but more often than not, I still let it make me jump because of the idea behind it.  You are not as alone as you think you are.  Something sinister is happening around you that you can't see.  Rotten Tomatoes describes The Woman in Black movie  as "Traditional to a fault" and I half-agree with that.  It's very traditional.  But I don't fault it for that because it was exactly what I wanted and when I thought about it at little more, that was exactly why I liked the book;  it plays to those ghost story traditions too. 

I think screenwriter Jane Goldman understood and respected this about the source material and that's why I can't call The Woman in Black an entirely unsuccessful adaptation.  I think it played out exactly the way a ghost story with those established parameters would.  But it's not a faithful adaptation and when you take out all those unsettlingly familiar scares that made me genuinely like the film, only the story is left and overall?

I have to say I prefer the book's more.

I give The Woman in Black three stars.  It's a serviceable horror film and because of this, I can see myself watching it a lot.  But if you're a huge fan of the book, you might find yourself (more than a little) disappointed.  

Thank you so much to the brilliant Courtney Summers for scaring the bejeezus out of us with this post.  Was that picture from The Grudge really necessary?  WAS IT?  No seriously, thank you - this was amazing!  

Courtney's new book, the very chilling This is Not a Test, was released this week and is available on Amazon and at other booksellers.  Courtney can be found at goodreads, twitter, and her blog.

She has also very graciously offered to give away one copy of This is Not a Test and one copy of The Woman in Black by Susan Hill.  The giveaway is open until next week and ends Thursday, June 28th.  U.S. and Canada only.  Two winners will be randomly selected.
a Rafflecopter giveaway
37 Comments
courtney link
6/21/2012 12:03:45 am

The picture from the Grudge was TOTALLY necessary! Without it, readers run the risk of being un-traumatized by this post and what is the fun in that, I ask you?! Exactly. ;)

THANK YOU so much, ladies, for having me on your blog. Between this and the Three Heads post you really helped make TINAT's release awesome. :)

Reply
Melanie B
6/21/2012 12:08:26 am

Pet Sematary by Stephen King... still have urges to sleep with lights on!

Reply
Becky L link
6/21/2012 12:15:53 am

My favorite horror movie changes daily according to mood. I'm a huge horror fan but most of the movies are disappointing of late. I did enjoy WOMAN IN BLACK and read the book as well, so was aware of the changes. For the most part I thought they worked and love Courtney's post!

Fave horror movie today: 28 Days Later

Reply
rhonda
6/21/2012 01:06:24 am

Carrie!!

Reply
Maja link
6/21/2012 04:03:53 am

Once again, I saw the US Canada thing too late. Sorry, ladies, please just delete the entries. I already bought This Is Not a Test, so I was entering just for Woman in Black anyway.

Somehow, my mind refuses to accept Daniel Radcliff in the role of a husband and father. But it doesn't really matter, I'm not brave enough to ever watch the movie. I saw the trailer recently and I'm still shaken up. I am much braver when it comes to books, so I've added it to my tbr. I am actually glad that I know who the woman in black is and how it all ends, it would be too stressful otherwise.

I was looking forward to this post ever since you announced it on Tuesday, and I loved it so much!

Reply
Beatriz Guadron
6/21/2012 05:38:29 am

I don't usually watch horror movies anymore, just for the simple fact that they scare me too much now >.< But I remember reading Pet Sematary by Stephen King, and watching the movie adaptation, when I was younger. I guess I wasn't so easily scared 10 years ago because I remember liking them!

Reply
Heidi link
6/21/2012 07:02:33 am

Let's talk about the fact that I read this book specifically so that I could watch the movie, but I've been too chicken to, and now I'm so traumatized that I probably never will. o.O

And by traumatized, I don't mean The Grudge picture, I mean you ruined Richard Armitage for me. Not really. It would take greater feats than this.

ANYWAY, love this BvM, thanks Courtney! I'll admit I threw up a little reading the movie ending though, why was that necessary? Maybe I'll just be happier having read the book. :P

Reply
Tatiana (The Readventurer) link
6/21/2012 10:32:10 am

Daniel Radcliffe as a father and widower? No, no! Too soon. He is still a small boy in glasses in my mind.

Reply
Monica link
6/21/2012 11:02:15 am

Well, I really enjoyed The Ring for a horror film. I haven't read much horror books because I read at night, and my house is already creepy enough! :)

Lol I loved this post. Thanks, Courtney! (even though I slowly moved to the coach next to my husband while looking at the Grudge girl- he's my hero if she leaps out at me, hehe)

Thanks for the giveaway!

-Monica Gutierrez

Reply
Cynthia link
6/21/2012 12:44:42 pm

I think that one of my fav horror films is 13 ghost... it hust has some pretty good scenes lol

Reply
Cricket link
6/21/2012 01:40:03 pm

Bram Stoker's Dracula

Reply
elena
6/21/2012 02:09:24 pm

I have watched exactly one horror film in my life which is a Korean one called Hansel & Gretel so I guess by default that's my fav!

Reply
Randi M.
6/21/2012 04:43:04 pm

Definitely IT (the novel) by Stephen King. Even though it scares the bejeezus out of me!

Reply
Jasprit link
6/21/2012 07:58:10 pm

Like Tatiana said I can't imagine Daniel Radcliffe as a father and a widower either, he'll always be known as Harry Potter (I still prefer referring to him as Harry Potter rather than Daniel Radcliffe!). I've also heard the book is a lot better, but some are saying the film wasn't half bad. I will definitely be picking up the book soonish and then the film afterwards! Great post Courtney! :)

Reply
jodi lasher
6/21/2012 08:53:23 pm

my favorite film has been the SAW movies.. Thanks

Reply
Christina K. link
6/21/2012 09:15:17 pm

My favorite is The Exorcist! Totally creepy and gross and scary:)

Thanks so much! Awesome post:)

Reply
mandee wyrick link
6/21/2012 11:55:09 pm

I would have to say The Grudge. I love all of the movies they've remade from Asian versions. Hmm, and A Tale of Two Sisters. I preferred the Asian version of that one but still, great movies come from that side of the world! Love the photo you posted!! LoL

Reply
Samantha R.
6/21/2012 11:56:38 pm

i actually quite enjoyed thus adaptation. I like films with elements of horror, like Pans Labyrinth.

Reply
Justine
6/22/2012 05:06:16 am

The Sixth Sense tops my list.

Reply
Betsy link
6/22/2012 06:04:39 am

I found your website a couple weeks ago through a goodreads review and I wanted to comment saying thank you for all the great book reviews! I've found so many great books after reading your site, that my To Be Read pile has taken over my living. Thanks and keep up the good work!

Reply
Natasha
6/22/2012 06:11:56 am

Pet Sematary is my favorite, the book and the movie. Thanks for the chance to win!

Reply
Melissa R.
6/22/2012 04:08:40 pm

I think Misery is my favorite! Kathy Bates did a wonderful job at acting like a psycho!

Reply
London Judge
6/23/2012 07:40:23 am

I love any old cheesy horror movies where you laugh just as much as scream! Thanks for the giveaway :)

Reply
Lauren Mackesy link
6/24/2012 04:50:19 am

13 Ghosts was really scary, and Candyman totally freaked me out. But the one movie that really got me was Seven, spelled Se7en with Brad Pitt and Morgan Freeman.

Reply
Shane R. link
6/24/2012 05:48:35 am

The Exorcist is my favorite horror film

Reply
Holly link
6/24/2012 02:59:08 pm

Probably Cujo!

Reply
Ames
6/24/2012 03:15:29 pm

Favorite horror film: Dead Snow
Favorite horror novel: Threshold by Caitlin R. Kiernan

Reply
Dani Nguyen
6/25/2012 01:15:00 am

The last scary movie I watch was The Ring. I saw it in the theater & was traumatized. I don't watch scary movies anymore lol.

I do like scary books though. Stephen King, Dean Koontz, etc.

Reply
Nazish @ Nazish Reads link
6/25/2012 07:48:03 am

Does Anna Dressed in Blood by Kendare Black count as a horror novel, if yes, then that's my answer.
Thanks for the giveaway.

Reply
Amanda link
6/25/2012 08:31:56 am

I actually hate horror films/books. If I had to choose, I'd go with a classic like Frankenstein.

Reply
Suz Reads
6/26/2012 01:15:51 am

Anything from Stephen King - movie or book! I loved Carrie, Christine, It, Pet Cemetary, and more! Very creep-tastic!

Reply
Christy
6/27/2012 03:47:48 am

I also love Stephen King! Pet Semetary is my favorite, and I also love The Shining. As far as movies go, I love Children of the Corn. It's terrible but I can't help it!

Reply
LisaILJ
6/27/2012 04:38:46 am

Nightmare on Elm Street absolutely terrified me as a kid. I don't know if I would say it was my favorite, but certainly my most memorable.

Reply
Amanda @ Reading for a Living link
6/27/2012 04:56:04 am

I agree completely about the movie, even though I haven't read the book yet. I didn't love it, but I didn't hate it. I jumped a few times and enjoyed all 'look behind you!' stuff as well. Very well put!

Reply
Amanda @ Reading for a Living link
6/27/2012 04:57:48 am

I forgot my favorite horror movie! Whoops! My favorite of late is Insidious! God that movie was creeeeppppppy.

Reply
Britney link
6/27/2012 05:00:40 am

I LOVED this review! I now have to read the book because I'm really interested in seeing how it is (I totally skipped over the spoilers haha). I've heard mixed opinions on the movie so I'll have to see if I'll watch it after I read the book.

Thanks for the giveaway! This Is Not A Test looks SO GOOD!

Reply
Sarah link
3/3/2013 05:17:14 am

Took me time to go through every one of the comments, but I truly enjoyed the article. It proved to get quite helpful to me and that i am certain to each of the commenters here! It is always great whenever you can not merely be informed, but also entertained! Cheers!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Follow Us On:

    Facebook Twitter Feed

    Subscribe:

    Subscribe
    Follow on Bloglovin

    Subscribe via email:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


    What We're Reading:

    Blood of my Blood cover

    Flannery

    Goodreads
    Monstrous Affections cover

     Tatiana

    Goodreads
    Rules of Civility cover

      Catie

    Goodreads

    Archives 

    March 2014
    September 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011

    Categories

    All
    Author Spotlight
    Book Events
    Book Vs. Movie
    Catie's Adult Reviews
    Catie's Y.A. Reviews
    Contest Or Giveaway
    Flannery's Adult Reviews
    Flannery's Y.A. Reviews
    If You Like This Maybe That
    Library Quest
    Odds & Ends On The Web
    Randomness
    Readalong Recaps
    She Made Me Do It
    Tatiana's Adult Reviews
    Tatiana's Y.A. Reviews
    Three Heads Are Better Than One Or Two
    Year Of The Classics


    Blogs We Follow

    Angieville
    Anna Scott Jots
    Badass Book Reviews
    The Book Geek
    The Book Smugglers
    Book Harbinger
    Books Take You Places
    Bunbury in the Stacks
    Chachic's Book Nook
    Clear Eyes, Full Shelves
    Collections
    Cuddlebuggery
    For the Love of Words
    The Galavanting Girl Books
    Inkcrush
    Intergalactic Academy
    Ivy Book Bindings
    The Nocturnal Library
    Rainy Day Ramblings
    The Readers Den
    The Reading Date
    Realm of Fiction
    Sash and Em
    Stacked
    The Unread Reader
    Vegan YA Nerds
    Wear The Old Coat
    Wordchasing
    Wrapped Up In Books
    Young Adult Anonymous 

    Grab A Button

    The Readventurer
    <div align="center"><a href="http://www.thereadventurer.com" title="The Readventurer"><img src="http://www.weebly.com/uploads/7/8/9/9/7899923/custom_themes/149267861480723643/files/TheReadventurer.png?1321429794244" alt="The Readventurer" style="border:none;" /></a></div>

    Parajunkee Design
    SiteLock
    Since 2/4/2012

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License.
Photos used under Creative Commons from savillent, vue3d, vue3d, ljcybergal